Monday, May 25, 2009

Spirit of Ireland a Synopsis of the Concept

.




SPIRIT of IRELAND
an attempt to simplify the concept

The Basic Idea.

· The project has been described as the Ardnacrusha (c1929) of today.
· The concept is to utilise Ireland’s endless free energy from the wind – with no pollution – and at no cost to the country.
· To build some 3000 Wind Turbines which will give lots of jobs in the building.


A Hydro-Storage Dam in Wales

· Identify 2 or 3 glacial mountain valleys to be dammed and used for pumped hydro-electric storage of the electricity. Ireland is almost unique in having natural reservoirs with a minimum of dam building needed.
· Turn these newly created waters into amenity and tourist areas. Adding to local development and jobs.
· Generate all our own electricity saving €3billion yearly going out of the country on imported fuels.
· Generate some more electricity than we need and export to UK and Europe.
· Keep Ireland pollution free and energy independent.


How is this to be arranged and managed?

· Currently there is an ad-hoc organising committee of 100% unpaid volunteers giving freely of their time and energy. It consists of engineers, scientists, accountants and others with knowledge and ability.
· The project concept needs to brought fully into the public consciousness and to be openly and co-operatively discussed by the people of Ireland.
· In the way forward there will be roadblocks, there will be vested interests, political football, localised objections, and dozens of difficulties to be overcome.


· If the People of Ireland embrace the idea it will live and prosper as did the Ardncrusha project at the birth of the State. If, on the other hand, the idea is rejected, or it gets bogged down in legislation or argument, it will die.
· If the project gets up and going, there will be a PLC formed which the people of Ireland will own 100%. It will act as a National Energy Co-operative.
· It will be open for subscription to all Irish citizens and will NOT be traded on the stock market.
· Every child in Ireland under 18 will be issued a share.
· The company will operate on behalf of the Irish People - its sole owners.
· The ownership will always remain in Irish hands.
· The project will be kept free of political interference, and out of the hands of investment corporations.

How will it progress?

· It is up to the Irish people. If the people embrace the idea it will proceed, creating a huge boost to the economy and to jobs. It has been described as the Ardnacrusha c1929 of today.
· If the people reject it will fade away.



.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Spirit of Ireland an Idea of it's Time

.





Personally, I am very excited and energised by the recent "Spirit of Ireland" energy proposal. I have been doing some research into aspects of the proposal and of the organisation, and will publish here soon a synopsis of:

(a) What exactly is proposed.
(b) The structure of the current project management.
(c) The proposed evolution of the project, ownership, funding etc. and
(d) An outline of the philosophy behind the entire proposal and how this might pan out in the future.

This exercise is more about my own need for clarification than for any other reason. I am open to correction on any misinformation that might creep into the post. Give me a few days to get to publishing stage.



.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Spirit of Ireland

.





Re-Birth of Irish Initiative
or just
Pie in the Sky?

I am sure many of you will have by now heard of the “Spirit of Ireland” energy initiative which was launched just over a week ago by Graham O’Donnell, an electronics engineer, who has personally funded the launch of this worthy idea. http://www.spiritofireland.org/

Ireland the land of “Rip Off” of “Gombeeen Men” of the “Brown Envelope Politics” of the “Nod and a Wink Strategy” with our Government behaving like rabbits caught in the headlamps, could well do with a galvanising co-operative initiative of some sort.

I congratulate Graham and his colleagues for taking this very brave step and wish the initiative every success, why wouldn't I, we will all benefit if it works. I recommend you take a look at the website and consider the proposals.

Some Serious Questions.

I do have some serious questions, not so much about the proposed engineering strategies, which are way beyond my ability to evaluate, but about the structure and strategies of an organisation that would aim to manage such a vast undertaking.

While applauding the initiative and wishing it every success, I have made my concerns known to “Spirit of Ireland”.


Posted on “Spirit of Ireland”

Before I could fully subscribe to any project, club, or organisation, there are a number of questions I would feel I have to ask regarding its structure. I have outlined here a set of basic questions about "Spirit of Ireland", by no means comprehensive, which I am hoping can be directly addressed and fully answered. That answers may not as yet exist for some of the posed question might indicate a lack of planning in the most fundamental foundation of the movement, and could well mitigate against its ultimate success.

I offer these questions in a constructive spirit, not implying criticism or in any way acting subversively.

1. What is the status of the named “Team” in "Spirit of Ireland"?
2. Who owns what?
3. Who makes policy and decisions?
4. How are working decisions made?
5. Who is in charge of what, what structure has the management?
6. How does someone get on the management team?
7. How does someone get sent off the management team?
8. Who gets paid for what, and who doesn’t?
9. Constitution of “Spirit of Ireland”, can we see a copy?
10. What organisational policies exist to date, and how flexible are these?
11. What planned projects exist to date, apart from the wind-hydro idea on the site, and are they set in stone or open to consultation?
12. What are the general rules for members?
13. What is the legal position of “Spirit of Ireland”?
14. How are projects to be funded?
15. What are the responsibilities implied by taking membership?


Some Published Opinions.

Other people with views and reservations, both technical and organisational, have voiced their opinions:


An opinion published in the Irish Times by Ray Kinsella.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/0511/1224246254647.html


Michael Hennigan of Finfacts 12th May 2009 has some strong views:
http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1016650.shtml

Professor Philip Walton Galway has some serious technical issues with the “Spirit of Ireland” Wind-Hydro proposal.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/hot-air-over-wind-energy-proposals-1735760.html




.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

New NanoTechnology Light Emitters

.


A New Way to Make Light?

I have been writing posts for some time about developments in LED (Light emitting Diode) and other forms of energy efficient lighting. While LEDs hold great promise, there are IMHO some fundamental technical limitations in the current technology.

Current LEDs are (1) not capable of matching halogen lamps in really high light output, (2) have poor colour stability, (3) produce too much heat, (4) are expensive to produce because of the need of special heat sinks, (5) are unstable in light output - again mainly because of heat and the colour dyes added, and (6) are as yet relatively inefficient.

All that may be about to change because of a recent discovery in the core science of light production at a molecular level.

Following is a very interesting article outlining this new science. It is reproduced in full with written permission from the on-line journal of the University of Rochester.







May 10, 2009

New Nanocrystals Show Potential for Cheap Lasers, New Lighting

For more than a decade, scientists have been frustrated in their attempts to create continuously emitting light sources from individual molecules because of an optical quirk called "blinking," but now scientists at the University of Rochester have uncovered the basic physics behind the phenomenon, and along with researchers at the Eastman Kodak Company, created a nanocrystal that constantly emits light.

The findings, detailed online in today's issue of Nature, may open the door to dramatically less expensive and more versatile lasers, brighter LED lighting, and biological markers that track how a drug interact with a cell at a level never before possible.

Many molecules, as well as crystals just a billionth of a meter in size, can absorb or radiate photons. But they also experience random periods when they absorb a photon, but instead of the photon radiating away, its energy is transformed into heat. These "dark" periods alternate with periods when the molecule can radiate normally, leading to the appearance of them turning on and off, or blinking.

Heat v/s Light

"A nanocrystal that has just absorbed the energy from a photon has two choices to rid itself of the excess energy—emission of light or of heat," says Todd Krauss, associate professor of chemistry at the University of Rochester and lead author on the study. "If the nanocrystal emits that energy as heat, you've essentially lost that energy."

Krauss worked with engineers at Kodak and researchers at the Naval Research Laboratory and Cornell University to discover the new, non-blinking nanocrystals.

Krauss, an expert in nanocrystals, and Keith Kahen, senior principal scientist of Kodak and an expert in optoelectronic materials and devices, were exploring new types of low-cost lighting similar to organic light-emitting diodes, but which might not suffer from the short lifespans and manufacturing challenges inherent in these diodes. Kahen, with help from Megan Hahn, a postdoctoral fellow in Krauss' laboratory, synthesized nanocrystals of various compositions.

Xiaoyong Wang, another postdoctoral fellow in Krauss laboratory, inspected one of these new nanocrystals and saw no evidence of the expected blinking phenomenon. Remarkably, even after four hours of monitoring, the new nanocrystal showed no sign of a single blink—unheard of when blinks usually happen on a scale of miliseconds to minutes.

After a lengthy investigation, Krauss and Alexander Efros from the Naval Research Laboratory concluded that the reason the blinking didn't occur was due to the unusual structure of the nanocrystal. Normally, nanocrystals have a core of one semiconductor material wrapped in a protective shell of another, with a sharp boundary dividing the two. The new nanocrystal, however, has a continuous gradient from a core of cadmium and selenium to a shell of zinc and selenium. That gradient squelches the processes that prevent photons from radiating, and the result is a stream of emitted photons as steady as the stream of absorbed photons.

Incredibly Cheap LEDs and Lasers?

With blink-free nanocrystals, Krauss believes lasers and lighting could be incredibly cheap and easy to fabricate. Currently, different color laser light is created using different materials and processes, but with the new nanocrystals a single fabrication process can create any color laser. To alter the light color, an engineer needs only to alter the size of the nanocrystal, which Krauss says is a relatively simple task.

The same is true of what could one day be OLED's successor, says Krauss. Essentially, "painting" a grid of differently sized nanocrystals onto a flat surface could create computer displays as thin as paper, or a wall that lights a room in any desired color.

This research was funded by the Eastman Kodak Company, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, the University of Rochester Center for Electronic Imaging Systems, the Cornell Center for Nanoscale Systems, the Office of Naval Research, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

CONTACT: Jonathan Sherwood EMail: jonathan.sherwood@rochester.edu
585.273.4726

www.rochester.edu




.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Regenysis, Plurion the Big Battery Burn-out?

.

An Update on Vanadium Batteries

I recently received a letter from Barry Walsh with some update news on the Big Battery business - Plurion et al. Thank you very much Barry for your interesting input. Barry has allowed me to publish as is - so here you are:



Hi Tony,
My name is Barry Walsh and I just wanted to say your blog is a great source of solid info, and cheers for putting it together.

I'm involved in some research into Energy Storage at the moment and have been following the Regenysis - VRB Power - Bust saga and some of the entertaining Plurion banter on your blog. I thought it might be relevant to that it seems there is a new buyer of the IP.Prudent Energy of China owned by JD Holdings http://www.pdenergy.com/encompany.html

Vanadium batteries are becoming a poisoned chalice, so I hope they make some progress! Just thought I'd let you know,

Best Regards,
Barry Walsh




Hi Barry - Many thanks for your email. I am always very happy to receive input to the blog. I would like to publish your letter as is. Is it OK to print your name or do you wish to be anonymous?

Regards and thanks,
Tony McGinley




Hi Tony, Sure no worries, just glad to be getting involved - someone might know some more about it. I personally am interested in seeing energy storage developments, as its clear Grid 25

http://www.eirgrid.com/EirgridPortal/uploads/Announcements/EirGrid%20GRID25.pdf

- wont come in time to save many of the wind projects that are being held up, and even if the Eirgrid do sort things out quicker than expected there are still load levelling issues that will require energy storage tech.


It will be an interesting race by the looks of it - and there are some interesting talkers at the ESA meeting in Washington in May. Anyone, I'm sure I'll be talking to you again,

Thanks and Regards,
Barry Walsh.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/barrywalshcork



.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

MagLev Wind Turbine update

.




Pretty picture artist impression of what is still Science Fiction
and a newish take on the Maglev turbine



Update of sorts on the
“Massive Maglev Vertical Axis
Multi-gigawatt Wind-Turbine”
idea!

I first wrote about the notion of a massive vertical axis multi-gigawatt frictionless magnetic bearing wind turbine almost one and a half years ago. To date, AFAIK, there is no visible sign of such a machine on the planet. http://wood-pellet-ireland.blogspot.com/2007/11/maglev-wind-turbines.html



A different take on the Mega Maglev
that is a rail line in front
- there is a play on "not missing the train"
and of course on the "real science" maglev train itself - Oh FGS give us a break guys!!


A helicopter about to land on the Helli-pad on top of the turbine - like Wow!!

There has been a gentle stir in the winds of the maglev turbine world, and a fair bit of You Tube video and other such hoo-ha associated with fishing for investors, but to date, no brick and mortar so-to-speak.


As "seen from above"
Looks like a Greek Temple!!

I have looked at some of the fancy video and include a few screen shots. The MagLev site invites contact but the doorways provided are interesting and tell a story, in as much as no provision for media or academic enquiries is provided.

One of the sites: http://magturbine.com/

Another site: http://www.maglevwindturbine.com/

A bit of a different twist on the subject on both sites. Heavy on the images, light on the science and solid facts.

Am I being way too cynical again here guys?? - I hope I will live to regret the cynical attitude and have to offer an apology. Somehow, I get the feeling that that day will be a while yet coming!





.

Friday, April 17, 2009

LED lamp Comparison Addendum

.



I have received a note from Liam Ellis of Vario Lighting regarding my last post. He wants to correct two points of information which I had incorrectly reported on their VX3 lamp.

1. The VX3 Lamp which I tested is NOT rated by Vario Lighting as being a 50 Watt equivalent. They prefer to rate it as a 35 watt replacement. But Liam points out that it is a fair compromise on light intensity in any case.

(That make the already large difference between the Ecopal and Vario Lighting lamps even greater!!!)

2. The transformer for the Vario Lighting lamps which I quoted, is good to supply up to 4 lamps, and not 6 lamps as I reported.

(I am happy to correct these and any other inaccuracies. If I have incorrectly reported the Ecopal bulb, I would also be happy to correct any inaccuracies)



.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Led Light Comparison

.






A Look at Two LED Bulbs
Both Claiming to be 50 watt Equivalent


Today I am posting a very simple comparison between two LED lamps both from Irish companies, both claim to be the equivalent of 50 watt tungsten lamps.


This is the Ecopal Multi-LED GU10 2 watt bulb



Ecopal 2 watt 5mm multi-LED bulb.


The first lamp is a multi LED GU10 from Ecopal Limerick. http://ecopal.ie/led-bulbs.asp The lamp gives a reasonably good account of itself. The bulb is constructed in a standard GU10 glass housing into the front of which is fitted a round piece of circuit board with holes punched for the 5mm LED bulbs. The rest of the bulb looks the same as any GU10 bulb. The lamp colour is very good indeed you could not fault it - slightly on the upper side of warm white, a pleasing colour of light to live with. However, the output on first impression, did not strike me as anywhere near that of a "50 equivalent" as stated on the packaging.

I spoke to a company representative and asked about the useful life of the lamp and the claim that the 2 watt lamp was the equivalent of a 50 watt tungsten bulb. Ecopal will guarantee that the bulb will not lose more than 20% of its light over its quoted life and that it will maintain its colour. As regards output, I did not hear the Ecopal representative actually say that the Lux output matched a 50watt equivalent type of GU10 bulb. What he did say was that the bulb is designed to replace a 50 watt bulb. So I decided to do a few basic tests on output. The Ecopal multi-LED bulb sells for €15.



Vario Lighting VX3 LED bulb.


The Vario Lighting VX3 LED Bulb and Transformer

The second bulb is from Vario Lighting http://www.variolighting.com/. It also claims to replace a 50 watt halogen. The Vario Lighting VX3 is a very high quality piece of engineering, very nice to look at. It is not a standard GU10 or MR16 type of bulb but will fit nicely into most downlighter fittings. It comes with its own little transformer to regulate the current.


Close-up of VX3 showing the Nicely Engineered Heatsink


The first thing to notice about this bulb is the massive aluminium lathe turned heatsink. The purpose of this heatsink is to take the heat away from the light emitters. It is a build-up of heat that, over time, damages the elements in LED lights. The VX3 bulb has 3 emitters and a lens to focus the light.

The Secret of LED Bulbs is Keeping things COOL

The secret of LED bulbs lies in keeping them cool. When they heat up the LEDs lose their power and change colour over time, keep them cool and they last much longer and maintain the original colour of light. That is why I think, of the two bulbs in discussion, the Vario Lighting bulb is more likely to maintain its output and colour over time.

The VX3 bulbs costs €25 plus a transformer to operate up to six bulbs costs €17. That would make a unit cost of €28.



The Ecopal bulb gave a reading of 7 on the Lux Meter

So I have two LED bulbs each claiming to have a light output equivalent to a 50 watt halogen. So I rig up both lamps and measure the Lux output from a given distance. The readings speak for themselves. Vario Lighting bulb has many times more light output than the Ecopal bulb.

The Vario Lighting Bulb gave a reading of 27 on the Lux Meter

At first I thought that the reading was influenced by the fact that the Vario Lighting bulb has a narrower beam of focus.

At 50% increased distance to target to compensate for light spread
The Vario Bulb still gives a reading of 27!!

I then move the bulb back 50% further from the target and so as to achieve a pool of light of a similar size as the Ecopal bulb. Still the Vario Lighting bulb showed the much higher reading.

The light meter does not lie. The Ecopal bulb output gives a reading of 7. The Vario Lighting bulb gives a reading of 27. That is a big difference to say the least, so it is quite clear that both bulbs cannot be giving the equivalent of a 50 watts tungsten bulb. No competition on light output here, the Vario Lighting bulb wins the game hands down.








.

Monday, April 06, 2009

Gov. Departments Studying my Blog

.





Irish Government Departments
"Studying" My Blog?


While checking my stats recently, I have noticed a trend where Irish Government Departments have been spending quite a bit of time reading my blog.

Now that might be simply some employee wasting time surfing the Internet, but I like to think it may be someone acting on behalf of a Minister or Department keeping an ear to the ground.


Focus of Attention?
One post that has got a good old looking at is my post on Fireplace Doors:

http://wood-pellet-ireland.blogspot.com/2008/10/hearth-and-home.html

This is a pet hobbyhorse of mine. I really believe that the fitting of fireplace doors to all open fires in the country would achieve a greater energy saving than most other efforts and for a very small investment.





.
.

Saturday, April 04, 2009

Minister Ryan's Electric Car

.





230,000 electric cars in Ireland by 2020
says Minister Ryan


According to a news report in the Irish Times “More than 200,000 Irish motorists will be driving electric cars in just over a decade” Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Eamon Ryan said that his department plans to have 10% of all the vehicles on the roads electrically powered by 2020.

Minister Ryan announced an agreement between the ESB, the Irish Government and the car makers Nissan and Renault. The “idea” is to “promote the introduction” of electric cars in Ireland. “This historic agreement is proof of the Government’s firm intention to act on the electrification of transport”

[It might unfortunately also be proof of the Governments lack of research into electric cars and their current severe limitations.]

Nissan and Renault bigwigs were in Dublin for signing of the agreement. Thierry Koskas of Renault, said the cars would cost about a tenth to run as compared with petrol and diesel cars, and that they can reach about 130km per hour, or about 100mph.

[ What Mt Koskas did not clarify was how much time it takes to charge the battery when it runs down, 8 to 10 hours currently. Nor did he say how much a replacement battery costs when you have to replace it at regular intervals every couple of years – currently almost 25% of the cost of the car. And - how will Ireland deal with 230,000 dud electric car batteries in a few years time??] [correction: some batteries could cost as much as 40% of the cars total cost!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wow!!!!!!!!]

Eric Nicholas of Nissan, said Ireland was ideal as a country in which to develop the introduction of electric cars because of its size and the “political will” here.

[Oh -Yes – because Ireland is desperate and gullible right now, and we are willing to take long shots – but what he did not say is that electric cars still have some very major failings mainly in the batteries and in the charging times and that the cost of batteries is sky high.]

He said a fully charged battery would enable a car to travel about 210 km, the equivalent of Dublin to Galway – and in Ireland 80 per cent of journeys were under 50km. Batteries can be charged in six to seven hours.

[ What he didn’t say was how were you going to get around in the Galway area with a flat battery? And that while charging the battery you probably would need to stay the night in Galway before making your return journey to Dublin – how useful is that?????]

Mr Ryan said he thought electric cars would be “very popular here” and were the “perfect transport solution” to the energy crisis. He said there were already tax allowances in place for companies that would choose to buy electric vehicles over petrol or diesel ones.

[ Maybe as popular as WoodPellet boilers are now after 3 years of massive grants??? Will the Minister provide free accommodation overnight for electric car travellers – while their electric cars are being re-charged??]

ESB chief executive Pádraig McManus said this was a chance for Ireland to demonstrate its leadership in the green revolution.

[Unless a fast, inexpensive, and efficient battery swap facility is provided every 50Km in Ireland, or alternatively, a much more efficient type of battery than currently available is invented, this is going to be just another hair-brained, money wasting, and doomed to failure, but well meaning project.]






.